Police Tactical Compact Leg Restraints (Fast Straps) & Belt Pouch

Product Information

Section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 suggests that whether or not the use of force was reasonable in the circumstances will be decided with reference to the circumstances as the officer believed them to be at the time of the force, such as when making the arrest. The initial risk assessment should be reviewed after the detainee has been placed in the cell (see Risk assessment). It should be repeated when and if the detainee has calmed down and is able to answer questions. Officers must record these procedures in the custody record. Review Injury or other effects caused by restraint

With the advent of a new type of aircraft known as the “light fighter”, it became increasingly important to reduce the weight of the ejection seat. At the same time, it was essential that the reduction in weight should not impair the operation and efficiency of the seat in any way. The construction of the Mk4 seat, although retaining the essential components of its predecessors, was therefore considerably modified. The basic 80 feet per second ejection gun was retained, having been proved to be sufficient for all current requirements, as was the Duplex Drogue system deployed by the half second time-delay drogue gun, together with a 1½ second time-release unit. Where detainees have been searched on arrest, they should not be left unsupervised until they have been presented to the custody officer, who will decide whether or not a further search is necessary. Such decisions, and any searches arising from them, must comply with PACE and the codes of practice. The search, the extent of the search and the subsequent retention of any article that the detainee has with them, depend on the decision made by the custody officer. In comparison to handcuffs, the wearing of leg irons may be found less restrictive. Thus, the prison authorities in several countries deem their long-term use acceptable. To avoid condoning this controversial practice, the countries of the European Union have banned exporting leg irons into non-EU countries. [5] [6] The countries that continue to make prisoners wear fetters long-term now tend to manufacture their own restraints. Where the removal of menstrual products isconsidered necessary as part of a self-harm or suicide risk, it should be subject to further specific risk assessment. All alternative options should be fully explored before making a decision to remove menstrual protection. Withholding articles When identifying options and contingencies, officers are required to apply their training, experience and skill to resolve a situation. They should consider the immediacy of the threat, necessity of their actions, proportionality and the potential community impact. All actions should be subject to continuous review and must be appropriately recorded. Lessons should be learnt, where appropriate. AssessmentThe decision to withhold articles from the detainee must be based on a risk assessment of each individual and the guidance given in PACE Code C. The custody officer must be alert to any signs of injury or effect caused by restraint and any behaviour or symptoms of illness that may indicate a need for medical attention. Where necessary, detainees requiring urgent medical attention should be taken to hospital. Officers should update the custody record accordingly.

Officers must closely monitor a person following discharge of the Taser. If the person is detained in a cell, they should be monitored and observed according to the risk assessment, such as at level 3 (constant supervision) or level 4 (close proximity). Warning signs include a detainee complaining of chest pain or shortness of breath. The custody officer should explain to the detainee why they are being searched and is responsible for the safekeeping of any property taken from the detainee. The ruling in this case is at variance with PACE Code C, Annex A, paragraph 11(e) on strip searches. Despite this ruling, care should clearly be taken in the operational context when considering such intrusive activity. Property removal and storage For detailed guidance on intimate and strip searches, see PACE Code C Annex A. Search of a detainee in custody A custody officer can require the removal of the handcuffs, although arresting or escort officers may remove them prior to or on arrival at the police station.All custody staff must receive training and refresher training in accordance with ACPO (2012) Personal Safety Manual of Guidance (available via College Learn to registered users only) and the National Custody Officer Learning Programme (NCOLP) (available via College Learn to registered users only). Custody officers should also be trained to supervise the searching of detainees in cells. This training should specifically cover thoroughness, control and restraint, and diversity issues. Documenting decisions